On 5 December 2011 17:51, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > While applying it I noticed that we were sharing the argument trees between > the two calls in a way that might be problematic, and I went ahead and fixed > that.
Ouch. Thanks. > I noticed that template/meminit1.C is ill-formed in C++11 as well, due to > "If a constructor delegates to itself directly or indirectly, the program is > ill-formed; no diagnostic is required." For this simple case of direct > delegation to itself, it should be pretty easy to give an error. I'll open > a PR for this. I suppose that for complete checking of such things, we need to have a complete class (all ctors defined), and then we'll have interesting times instantiating whatever dependent constructor templates. I personally think that bit should be undefined behavior rather than ill-formed, but I guess that's for a different forum to discuss. > Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk. Thanks!
