On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 04:17:17PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > On Вт, ноя 12, 2019 at 14:08, Andreas Schwab <sch...@suse.de> > wrote: > >On Nov 12 2019, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote: > >> I'm definitely missing something. Who are these users, and how can > >>they > >> make anything useful of these functions if they don't even pass an > >> argument? > > > >By printing the desired value. > > Hah, okay. Well, in this case their workflow now gonna be 2 times > simpler since they don't have to type in two commands, but only one :)
Do we have to type parentheses now? That more than undoes that gain :-/ > Besides, I suspect, the number of actual users of this gdbinit is > around zero, otherwise someone would have noticed the warning that gdb > prints on every usage of these functions while the PATCH 1/2 is not > applied. There are users. There are users who have been used to this behaviour for many many many years. People just do (say I have an "rtx insn"): p insn pr A new version where you just say pr insn would be nice; something that requires pr(insn) is less nice. It would be great if you could come up with something that keeps the old syntax working as well, especially since many of us have to work with older versions of the gdbinit as well, for years to come. People can adjust their work habits of course, but that causes a lot of friction ;-) Segher
