On 11/5/19 6:21 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > The base class for ranges is currently value_range_base, which is rather > long and cumbersome. It also occurs more often than the derived class > of value_range. To avoid confusion, and save typing, this patch does a > global rename from value_range to value_range_equiv, and from > value_range_base to value_range. > > This way, the base class is simply value_range, and the derived class is > value_range_equiv which explicitly states what it does. > > OK? > > Aldy > > p.s. There are a few minor cleanups throughout... like moving some > random variable definitions closer to their first use. I figured they > were harmless while I was in the vicinity. OK. As would be Richi's suggestion for value_range_with_equiv.
I don't think we want to use evrp in the name though. I don't think this stuff is going to be limited to the EVRP space. jeff
