2011/11/30 Weddington, Eric <eric.wedding...@atmel.com>: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Henderson >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:30 AM >> To: Georg-Johann Lay >> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric; > Anatoly >> Sokolov >> Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR] Light-weight DImode implementation. >> >> On 11/29/2011 10:11 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> > The only question that remains is what the -m64 option should be > like? >> > >> > [ ] Omit it altogether >> > [ ] Leave it as is (off per default) >> > [ ] Set it on per default >> > >> > As soon as the direction is clear, I'll post a follow-up patch to > add >> the >> > missing bits like, e.g., documentation for the new switch. >> >> I'll leave the decision to Denis, but I'm for omitting it. > > I will also defer to Denis, but I'd rather avoid having another option, > if we can. Keep it simple for the users. >
I'm agree with Richard. I'm for omitting it. Denis.
