On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:14 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 06:44:15PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On September 1, 2019 6:34:25 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> 
> > wrote:
> > >On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 08:25:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >> So why not always return an unsigned type then by telling
> > >type_for_size?
> > >
> > >So like this (if it passes bootstrap/regtest)?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Unfortunately that didn't work, because TYPE_MAX_VALUE/TYPE_MIN_VALUE
> are not present on POINTER_TYPEs.
>
> Here is an updated version that passed bootstrap/regtest on both
> x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Seems like this would fix PR91632 also.
Which has a C testcase included.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

>
> 2019-09-02  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
>
>         PR go/91617
>         * fold-const.c (range_check_type): For enumeral and boolean
>         type, pass 1 to type_for_size langhook instead of
>         TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype).  Return unsigned_type_for result whenever
>         etype isn't TYPE_UNSIGNED INTEGER_TYPE.
>         (build_range_check): Don't call unsigned_type_for for pointer types.
>         * match.pd (X / C1 op C2): Don't call unsigned_type_for on
>         range_check_type result.
>
> --- gcc/fold-const.c.jj 2019-08-27 22:52:24.207334541 +0200
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c    2019-09-01 22:46:17.091058145 +0200
> @@ -4938,10 +4938,9 @@ range_check_type (tree etype)
>    /* First make sure that arithmetics in this type is valid, then make sure
>       that it wraps around.  */
>    if (TREE_CODE (etype) == ENUMERAL_TYPE || TREE_CODE (etype) == 
> BOOLEAN_TYPE)
> -    etype = lang_hooks.types.type_for_size (TYPE_PRECISION (etype),
> -                                           TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype));
> +    etype = lang_hooks.types.type_for_size (TYPE_PRECISION (etype), 1);
>
> -  if (TREE_CODE (etype) == INTEGER_TYPE && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (etype))
> +  if (TREE_CODE (etype) == INTEGER_TYPE && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype))
>      {
>        tree utype, minv, maxv;
>
> @@ -4959,6 +4958,8 @@ range_check_type (tree etype)
>        else
>         return NULL_TREE;
>      }
> +  else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (etype))
> +    etype = unsigned_type_for (etype);
>    return etype;
>  }
>
> @@ -5049,9 +5050,6 @@ build_range_check (location_t loc, tree
>    if (etype == NULL_TREE)
>      return NULL_TREE;
>
> -  if (POINTER_TYPE_P (etype))
> -    etype = unsigned_type_for (etype);
> -
>    high = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, high);
>    low = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, low);
>    exp = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, exp);
> --- gcc/match.pd.jj     2019-08-27 12:26:40.745863588 +0200
> +++ gcc/match.pd        2019-09-01 18:23:02.098729356 +0200
> @@ -1569,8 +1569,6 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY
>         tree etype = range_check_type (TREE_TYPE (@0));
>         if (etype)
>           {
> -           if (! TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype))
> -             etype = unsigned_type_for (etype);
>             hi = fold_convert (etype, hi);
>             lo = fold_convert (etype, lo);
>             hi = const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, etype, hi, lo);
>
>
>         Jakub

Reply via email to