Hi! Apparently my recent tree-{cfg,switch-conversion}.c changes broke a bunch of go tests. The problem is that range_check_type actually doesn't guarantee an unsigned type; it forces integer type for enum/bool (that was what was really needed to fix the PR), and for integer types that don't wrap forces unsigned type (and then verifies the wrap-around). Seems go uses -fwrapv by default and we got thus signed types from it. That is fine if we emit the x >= low && x < high range tests as x - low >= 0 && x - low < high - low, but we actually don't emit the >= 0 check and so we do need an unsigned type. The other uses of range_check_type also eventually also call unsigned_type_for, e.g. etype = range_check_type (etype); if (etype == NULL_TREE) return NULL_TREE; if (POINTER_TYPE_P (etype)) etype = unsigned_type_for (etype); and in the recursion then because low is 0: if (! TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)) { etype = unsigned_type_for (etype); high = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, high); exp = fold_convert_loc (loc, etype, exp); } Similarly match.pd: tree etype = range_check_type (TREE_TYPE (@0)); if (etype) { if (! TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)) etype = unsigned_type_for (etype); ... So, the following patch calls unsigned_type_for on the range_check_type result.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2019-08-31 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR go/91617 * tree-cfg.c (generate_range_test): Call unsigned_type_for on the range_check_type result. * tree-switch-conversion.c (switch_conversion::build_one_array, bit_test_cluster::emit): Likewise. --- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj 2019-08-31 12:09:09.135153318 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-cfg.c 2019-08-31 12:48:06.259939680 +0200 @@ -9222,6 +9222,7 @@ generate_range_test (basic_block bb, tre { tree type = TREE_TYPE (index); tree utype = range_check_type (type); + utype = unsigned_type_for (utype); low = fold_convert (utype, low); high = fold_convert (utype, high); --- gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c.jj 2019-08-31 12:09:09.129153406 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-switch-conversion.c 2019-08-31 12:48:28.340617487 +0200 @@ -616,6 +616,7 @@ switch_conversion::build_one_array (int /* We must use type of constructor values. */ gimple_seq seq = NULL; + type = unsigned_type_for (type); tree tmp = gimple_convert (&seq, type, m_index_expr); tree tmp2 = gimple_build (&seq, MULT_EXPR, type, wide_int_to_tree (type, coeff_a), tmp); @@ -1486,6 +1487,7 @@ bit_test_cluster::emit (tree index_expr, unsigned int count; tree unsigned_index_type = range_check_type (index_type); + unsigned_index_type = unsigned_type_for (unsigned_index_type); gimple_stmt_iterator gsi; gassign *shift_stmt; Jakub