> > +/*** Order of Allocation of Registers. */
> > +
> > +/* We generally want to put call-clobbered registers ahead of
> > + call-saved ones. (IRA expects this.) */
> > +#define REG_ALLOC_ORDER \
> > + {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11}
>
> Do you gain much by defining this? I would have expected better
> code without, given the architecture is so regular.
It does exactly the same as not defining REG_ALLOC_ORDER, just a tiny
bit less efficient.
Yeah I just removed the definition from the port.
