On 05/07/19 20:23 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote:
Am Fr., 5. Juli 2019 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>:
[..]
I decided against the simplification in the second patch, and
committed the attached one which is closer to the first patch I sent
(preserving the __atomic_add and __exchange_and_add functions even
when they just call the built-ins).
Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc64-linux, powerpc-aix. Committed to trunk.
Unrelated to the actual patch, I noticed some explicit "throw()" forms
used as exception specifications - shouldn't these be replaced by
either explicit "noexcept" or at least by a library macro that expands
to one or the other?
Yes, they should be _GLIBCXX_NOTHROW.
(I'm sorry, if such unrelated questions are
considered as inappropriate for this list).
Entirely appropriate, thanks!
