Am Fr., 5. Juli 2019 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com>: > [..] > I decided against the simplification in the second patch, and > committed the attached one which is closer to the first patch I sent > (preserving the __atomic_add and __exchange_and_add functions even > when they just call the built-ins). > > Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc64-linux, powerpc-aix. Committed to trunk.
Unrelated to the actual patch, I noticed some explicit "throw()" forms used as exception specifications - shouldn't these be replaced by either explicit "noexcept" or at least by a library macro that expands to one or the other? (I'm sorry, if such unrelated questions are considered as inappropriate for this list). - Daniel
