Hi! While testing the second PR90811 patch with nvptx offloading, I've noticed 3 warnings in nvptx.c. The first two hunks are obvious, the last warning is about unused mode_label variable. Either we can do what the patch does, or another option is throw away both the mode_jump and mode_label temporaries, keep the last hunk unmodified and - *mode_jump = label_insn; + if (mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR) + vector_jump = neuter_start; + else + worker_jump = neuter_start;
2019-06-12 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> * config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_sese_number, nvptx_sese_pseudo): Don't wrap ei variable name in the declaration in ()s. (nvptx_single): Actually use mode_label variable. Formatting fix. --- gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c.jj 2019-06-11 23:21:28.068148871 +0200 +++ gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c 2019-06-11 23:27:30.412633621 +0200 @@ -3551,7 +3551,7 @@ nvptx_sese_number (int n, int p, int dir size_t offset = (dir > 0 ? offsetof (edge_def, dest) : offsetof (edge_def, src)); edge e; - edge_iterator (ei); + edge_iterator ei; FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, edges) { @@ -3574,7 +3574,7 @@ nvptx_sese_pseudo (basic_block me, bb_se vec<edge, va_gc> *edges, size_t offset) { edge e; - edge_iterator (ei); + edge_iterator ei; int hi_back = depth; pseudo_node_t node_back (0, depth); int hi_child = depth; @@ -4402,8 +4402,10 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block { rtx_code_label *label = gen_label_rtx (); rtx pred = cfun->machine->axis_predicate[mode - GOMP_DIM_WORKER]; - rtx_insn **mode_jump = mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ? &vector_jump : &worker_jump; - rtx_insn **mode_label = mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ? &vector_label : &worker_label; + rtx_insn **mode_jump + = mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ? &vector_jump : &worker_jump; + rtx_insn **mode_label + = mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR ? &vector_label : &worker_label; if (!pred) { @@ -4437,10 +4439,7 @@ nvptx_single (unsigned mask, basic_block emit_insn_after (gen_exit (), label_insn); } - if (mode == GOMP_DIM_VECTOR) - vector_label = label_insn; - else - worker_label = label_insn; + *mode_label = label_insn; } /* Now deal with propagating the branch condition. */ Jakub