On 6/10/19 1:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:23:28PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
+  else if (integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1))
+          /* Dump the types of INTEGER_CSTs explicitly, for we can't
+             infer them and MEM_ATTR caching will share MEM_REFs
+             with differently-typed op0s.  */
+          && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)) != INTEGER_CST
+          /* Released SSA_NAMES have no TREE_TYPE.  */
+          && TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)) != NULL_TREE
+          /* Same pointer types, but ignoring POINTER_TYPE vs.
+             REFERENCE_TYPE.  */
+          && (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)))
+              == TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1))))
+          && (TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)))
+              == TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1))))
+          && (TYPE_REF_CAN_ALIAS_ALL (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 0)))
+              == TYPE_REF_CAN_ALIAS_ALL (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1))))
+          /* Same value types ignoring qualifiers.  */
+          && (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (node))
+              == TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
+              (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (node, 1)))))

You should be using types_compatible_p rather than type equality, that is
all GIMPLE cares about.

The code above predates my change, I just factored it out into
a separate function; it does make the diff bigger.  The code
I introduced only adds the <...> if the size of the access
differs from the size of the operand. I used type sizes rather
than testing their compatibility to minimize the number of tests
that might need updating.

This is the salient bit:

+      pp_string (pp, "MEM");
+
+      tree nodetype = TREE_TYPE (node);
+      tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (node, 0);
+      tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (node, 1);
+      tree op1type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (op1));
+
+      if (!tree_int_cst_equal (TYPE_SIZE (nodetype),
+                              TYPE_SIZE (TREE_TYPE (op1type))))
+       {
+         pp_string (pp, " <");
+         /* If the size of the type of the operand is not the same
+            as the size of the MEM_REF expression include the type
+            of the latter similar to the TDF_GIMPLE output to make
+            it clear how many bytes of memory are being accessed.  */
+         dump_generic_node (pp, nodetype, spc, flags | TDF_SLIM, false);
+         pp_string (pp, "> ");
+       }

Martin

Reply via email to