> On May 30, 2019, at 3:38 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 15:17 -0500, Qing Zhao wrote: >>> On May 30, 2019, at 2:13 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@ >>> gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 30 May 2019 18:23:43 CEST, Qing Zhao <qing.z...@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> PR 90581 (provide an option to adjust the maximum depth of nested >>>> #include) >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90581 >>>> >>>> is to add a new cpp option -fmax-inlcude-depth >>> >>> Typo inl vs inc. >> >> Okay, will fix this. >> >>> >>> Why isn't this a param? >> >> do you mean to change “-fmax-include-depth=” to “-param max-include- >> depth=“? >> > > That sounds like a good idea to me.
can -param be accepted by preprocessor? I didn’t see any -param in gcc/c-family/c.opt. where should I define a -param for preprocessor? thanks. Qing > >>> Wouldn't a param ease range checking not to overflow the uint max >>> and maybe automagically provide diagnostics for out of range input? > > (indeed) > >
