On 5/22/19 8:54 PM, Alan Modra wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:51:50PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Treat >> PROCESSOR_FUTURE similarly to PROCESSOR_POWER9 for now. >> (rs6000_machine_from_flags): Handle future cpu. >> (rs6000_reassociation_width): Treat PROCESSOR_FUTURE like >> PROCESSOR_POWER9 for now. >> (rs6000_adjust_cost): Likewise. >> (rs6000_issue_rate): Likewise. > rs6000_register_move_cost needs similar tweaks. > Does it? I don't believe the slow LR/CTR move applies. However, the cost for direct moves probably should be treated the same as POWER9, I think... I will plan to make that change.
Thanks! Bill
