On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:44:15PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 6 May 2019 15:16:20 CEST, Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Volatile memory does not match the memory_operand predicate.  This
> >causes extra extend/mask instructions instructions when reading
> >from volatile memory.  On OpenRISC loading volitile memory can be
> 
> s/volitile/volatile/g
> 
> also at least in the test.
> Thanks,

Thank you,

I always mispell that one.

-Stafford

> 
> >diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c
> >b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 00000000000..8ddea4e659f
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c
> 
> >+/* Check to ensure the volitile load does not get zero extended.  */
> 

Reply via email to