On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 07:44:15PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On 6 May 2019 15:16:20 CEST, Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Volatile memory does not match the memory_operand predicate. This > >causes extra extend/mask instructions instructions when reading > >from volatile memory. On OpenRISC loading volitile memory can be > > s/volitile/volatile/g > > also at least in the test. > Thanks,
Thank you, I always mispell that one. -Stafford > > >diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c > >b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c > >new file mode 100644 > >index 00000000000..8ddea4e659f > >--- /dev/null > >+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/or1k/swap-2.c > > >+/* Check to ensure the volitile load does not get zero extended. */ >
