OK.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:27 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 01:09:00PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > > cp/
> > > * call.c (null_ptr_cst_p): Order checks according to expensiveness.
> > > (conversion_null_warnings): Likewise.
> > > * typeck.c (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Return
> > > early if type1 == type2.
> >
> > this patch caused
> >
> > +XPASS: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C -std=gnu++98 bug (test for warnings,
> > line 14)
> >
> > First seen on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and sparc-sun-solaris2.11, according
> > to gcc-testresults everywhere. Confirmed by reverting the patch locally
> > and re-testing the affected testcase.
>
> I can reproduce that too, seems to be the
> @@ -6896,8 +6897,8 @@
> }
> /* Handle zero as null pointer warnings for cases other
> than EQ_EXPR and NE_EXPR */
> - else if (null_ptr_cst_p (expr) &&
> - (TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (totype) || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (totype)))
> + else if ((TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (totype) || NULLPTR_TYPE_P (totype))
> + && null_ptr_cst_p (expr))
> {
> location_t loc = get_location_for_expr_unwinding_for_system_header
> (expr);
> maybe_warn_zero_as_null_pointer_constant (expr, loc);
> hunk. The Wunused-var-35.C patch hasn't been posted to gcc-patches, but
> judging from the corresponding PR, I'd say the right thing is below.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2019-04-25 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/44648
> * g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C: Remove xfail.
>
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C.jj 2019-02-04
> 09:44:31.365413407 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-35.C 2019-04-25 13:24:49.717065815
> +0200
> @@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ int main()
> else
> return 1;
>
> - if (const bool b2 = 1) // { dg-warning "\\\[-Wunused-variable\\\]" "bug" {
> xfail c++98_only } }
> + if (const bool b2 = 1) // { dg-warning "\\\[-Wunused-variable\\\]" }
> return 0;
> else
> return 1;
> }
> -
>
>
> Jakub
