On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 14:51, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:45:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 2/20/19 6:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:13:54AM +0000, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > > >> This patch causes a number of test regressions for (at least) arm and > > >> amdgcn. I've run a bisect and confirmed this is the first commit where it > > >> doesn't work. > > > > > > The following, so far untested (except for x86_64->armv7hl-linux-gnueabi > > > cross on the builtin-math-7.c testcase and x86_64-linux native on the > > > pr88074* testcases) patch should cure this, will bootstrap/regtest it > > > tonight. > > > > > > 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > > > > > PR middle-end/88074 > > > * toplev.c (do_compile): Double the emin/emax exponents to workaround > > > buggy mpc_norm. > > > > > > * gcc.dg/pr88074-2.c: New test. > > I've got a couple dozen crosses failing because of the recent changes. > > I can throw this into the tester and check all of them pretty easily if > > that would be helpful. > > Yes, it would be helpful. I've just checked the aarch64 sinatan-1.c and the > patch restores the previous behavior on that testcase too. >
FWIW, I've sent your patch for testing too (cross arm and aarch64, c/c++/fortran) Christophe > Jakub
