On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:45:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 2/20/19 6:22 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 11:13:54AM +0000, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> >> This patch causes a number of test regressions for (at least) arm and
> >> amdgcn. I've run a bisect and confirmed this is the first commit where it
> >> doesn't work.
> >
> > The following, so far untested (except for x86_64->armv7hl-linux-gnueabi
> > cross on the builtin-math-7.c testcase and x86_64-linux native on the
> > pr88074* testcases) patch should cure this, will bootstrap/regtest it
> > tonight.
> >
> > 2019-02-20 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR middle-end/88074
> > * toplev.c (do_compile): Double the emin/emax exponents to workaround
> > buggy mpc_norm.
> >
> > * gcc.dg/pr88074-2.c: New test.
> I've got a couple dozen crosses failing because of the recent changes.
> I can throw this into the tester and check all of them pretty easily if
> that would be helpful.
Yes, it would be helpful. I've just checked the aarch64 sinatan-1.c and the
patch restores the previous behavior on that testcase too.
Jakub
