On 11/08/2011 09:54 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+ if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (fn)) != LANG_TYPE)
You don't need to check this, since OVL_CURRENT always gives a function.
It seems like a lot of the complexity of lookup_literal_operator is for
dealing with string literals, which is the case where we don't need to
look at the parameter types anyway; we can just build a call. 2.14.8/5
doesn't say anything about the overload set.
It also looks like lookup_literal_operator called with no arguments
(i.e. for the template case of numeric literals) will just return the
first function in the overload set, which may not be right.
Jason
