On 21/01/19 17:36 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:11:04PM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I'd like to ping this patch.
For P0941R2 I think we can just say it's supported. For the library
docs I said we support it since GCC 5.1 because that's when we started
defining feature test macros. The point of the paper is to define
macros for the features that are supported, and we've been doing that
for years. If a macro is missing, it's because we don't support the
feature yet, and that's a correct implementation of the macro!
So what about saying it is supported since e.g. 5 when __has_cpp_attribute
support has been added (or 4.9 when first __cpp_* predefined macros were
added)? Like below.
What about the rest, ok for wwwdocs?
LGTM.
