Hi Alan, On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:39:27AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:05:57AM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:40:01AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > > Since I broke powerpc*-freebsd and the other non-linux powerpc > > > targets, I guess I ought to fix them. The following is a variation on > > > your first patch, that results in -mcall-linux for powerpc-freebsd* > > > providing the 32-bit powerpc-linux dynamic linker. > > > > That, like the first patch, abuses that header file. Please do it > > somewhere sane instead, not in a random subtarget file? > > Is there is a better place, currently? sysv4.h contains a mess of OS > related defines already, to support various -mcall options. If those > stay in sysv4.h I can't see a better place for the fall-back > GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER define.
I was hoping you would untangle it a bit. My dastardly plan failed, apparently. Drat. Should anything use GNU_USER_DYNAMIC_LINKER if it isn't defined? Maybe it is better if the use in sysv4.h had an #ifdef around it? For all the other uses it should be always defined. Or maybe we should have a linux32.h as well? Segher
