On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 18:56, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not just fix the issue instead of erroring out? No other option > has issues with LTO other than TM. In fact I think this should have > been a merge blocker really. I disagree. TM is a new experimental feature. It is fine if it is not supported with all optimization options. There are other features not supported with LTO after all (optimization option nodes, omp clauses, etc). In the context of TM, support of LTO and FDO will certainly be an important optimization vector for future work, so I don't expect it to be unsupported for long. Diego.
