On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> > So omp-simd-notinbranch or omp_simd_notinbranch?
> > Any particular reason for this weird syntax and for not also
> > supporting inbranch or just simd?
>
> Questionable whether to support as current glibc vector ABI only uses
> notinbranch?
simd attribute supports all those three cases, i.e.
__attribute__((simd)), __attribute__((simd ("notinbranch"))) and
__attribute__((simd ("inbranch"))).
So at least for consistency it would be nice to support the same thing.
Some users could e.g. provide a vectorized definition for other builtins
and have e.g. inbranch support there only (the vectorizer can use those
by providing all ones masks).
Jakub
