[Updated after new 37/46 and 38/46]

After previous changes, it makes more sense for STMT_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR
to be dr_vec_info rather than a data_reference.


2018-07-26  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandif...@arm.com>

gcc/
        * tree-vectorizer.h (_loop_vec_info::unaligned_dr): Change to
        dr_vec_info.
        * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment): Update
        accordingly.
        * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Likewise.
        * tree-vect-loop-manip.c (get_misalign_in_elems): Likewise.
        (vect_gen_prolog_loop_niters): Likewise.

Index: gcc/tree-vectorizer.h
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-vectorizer.h       2018-07-26 11:42:19.035663718 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vectorizer.h       2018-07-26 11:42:24.919598492 +0100
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ typedef struct _loop_vec_info : public v
   tree mask_compare_type;
 
   /* Unknown DRs according to which loop was peeled.  */
-  struct data_reference *unaligned_dr;
+  struct dr_vec_info *unaligned_dr;
 
   /* peeling_for_alignment indicates whether peeling for alignment will take
      place, and what the peeling factor should be:
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c   2018-07-26 11:42:19.031663762 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c   2018-07-26 11:42:24.915598537 +0100
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment (loop_v
                vect_update_misalignment_for_peel (dr_info, dr0_info, npeel);
              }
 
-          LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo) = dr0_info->dr;
+          LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo) = dr0_info;
           if (npeel)
             LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo) = npeel;
           else
Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-vect-loop.c        2018-07-26 11:42:19.031663762 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.c        2018-07-26 11:42:24.919598492 +0100
@@ -2142,8 +2142,7 @@ vect_analyze_loop_2 (loop_vec_info loop_
          /* Niters for peeled prolog loop.  */
          if (LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_ALIGNMENT (loop_vinfo) < 0)
            {
-             dr_vec_info *dr_info
-               = DR_VECT_AUX (LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo));
+             dr_vec_info *dr_info = LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo);
              tree vectype = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (dr_info->stmt);
              niters_th += TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype) - 1;
            }
Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c  2018-07-26 11:42:19.031663762 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.c  2018-07-26 11:42:24.915598537 +0100
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer (loop_v
 static tree
 get_misalign_in_elems (gimple **seq, loop_vec_info loop_vinfo)
 {
-  dr_vec_info *dr_info = DR_VECT_AUX (LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo));
+  dr_vec_info *dr_info = LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo);
   stmt_vec_info stmt_info = dr_info->stmt;
   tree vectype = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info);
 
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ get_misalign_in_elems (gimple **seq, loo
 vect_gen_prolog_loop_niters (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo,
                             basic_block bb, int *bound)
 {
-  dr_vec_info *dr_info = DR_VECT_AUX (LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo));
+  dr_vec_info *dr_info = LOOP_VINFO_UNALIGNED_DR (loop_vinfo);
   tree var;
   tree niters_type = TREE_TYPE (LOOP_VINFO_NITERS (loop_vinfo));
   gimple_seq stmts = NULL, new_stmts = NULL;

Reply via email to