Hi Janus,
I tested it on a fairly large code base and found no further false positives. Also it still regtests cleanly. Ok for trunk?
while I still disagree with this on principle, I will not stand
in the way.
However, one point: I think that the warning should be under a separate
warning, which should then be enabled by -Wextra.
-Waggressive-function-elimination, could be reused for this,
or something else
Regards
Thomas
