Hi! We allow only equality/non-equality comparisons of complex numbers, so introducing less than or greater or equal than comparison for them from non-equality ones + division is a bad idea; e.g. the expansion will not handle those.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/8.2? 2018-06-15 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/86123 * match.pd ((X / Y) == 0 -> X < Y): Don't transform complex divisions. Fix up comment formatting. * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr86123.c: New test. --- gcc/match.pd.jj 2018-06-14 21:07:15.785350884 +0200 +++ gcc/match.pd 2018-06-15 08:14:56.134977947 +0200 @@ -1462,14 +1462,15 @@ (define_operator_list COND_BINARY (op @1 { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@1)); })))) /* Transform: - * (X / Y) == 0 -> X < Y if X, Y are unsigned. - * (X / Y) != 0 -> X >= Y, if X, Y are unsigned. - */ + (X / Y) == 0 -> X < Y if X, Y are unsigned. + (X / Y) != 0 -> X >= Y, if X, Y are unsigned. */ (for cmp (eq ne) ocmp (lt ge) (simplify (cmp (trunc_div @0 @1) integer_zerop) (if (TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (@0)) + /* Complex ==/!= is allowed, but not </>=. */ + && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (@0)) != COMPLEX_TYPE && (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type) || !VECTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0)))) (ocmp @0 @1)))) --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr86123.c.jj 2018-06-15 08:27:24.851654403 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr86123.c 2018-06-15 08:27:11.632645612 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* PR middle-end/86123 */ + +int +foo (_Complex unsigned x, _Complex unsigned y) +{ + _Complex unsigned t1 = x / y; + int t2 = (t1 != 0); + return t2; +} + +int +bar (_Complex unsigned x, _Complex unsigned y) +{ + _Complex unsigned t1 = x / y; + int t2 = (t1 == 0); + return t2; +} Jakub