On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > As mentioned in the PR, the current __cpp_transactional_memory macro > value with -fgnu-tm is clearly bogus, what will be standardized in 2105 > is unknown. > > The big question is if we should go with the value that was meant to be used > in r228462 as this patch does, or if we should go for 201505 - is > atomic_cancel implemented now?
This patch is OK; atomic_cancel is not implemented. Jason
