Hi all,

attached patch partially reverts r259385 preventing an ICE. At the same time
the check_dependency routine is parameterized correctly so that variable
dependencies in coarray expressions are determined more precisely.

Bootstrapped and regtested ok on x86_64-linux-gnu/f27. Ok for trunk,
gcc-8/-7/-6?

Regards,
        Andre
-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

2018-04-30  Andre Vehreschild  <ve...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/85507
        * dependency.c (gfc_dep_resolver): Revert looking at coarray dimension
        introduced by r259385.
        * trans-intrinsic.c (conv_caf_send): Always report a dependency for
        same variables in coarray assignments.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2018-04-30  Andre Vehreschild  <ve...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/85507
        * gfortran.dg/coarray_dependency_1.f90: New test.
        * gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90: Fix counting caf-expressions.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
index 3e14ddc25d8..a0bbd584947 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/dependency.c
@@ -2238,9 +2238,8 @@ gfc_dep_resolver (gfc_ref *lref, gfc_ref *rref, gfc_reverse *reverse)
 	    break;
 
 	  /* Exactly matching and forward overlapping ranges don't cause a
-	     dependency, when they are not part of a coarray ref.  */
-	  if (fin_dep < GFC_DEP_BACKWARD
-	      && lref->u.ar.codimen == 0 && rref->u.ar.codimen == 0)
+	     dependency.  */
+	  if (fin_dep < GFC_DEP_BACKWARD)
 	    return 0;
 
 	  /* Keep checking.  We only have a dependency if
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
index 00edd447bb2..87b3ca72c05 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
@@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ conv_caf_send (gfc_code *code) {
 
   lhs_expr = code->ext.actual->expr;
   rhs_expr = code->ext.actual->next->expr;
-  may_require_tmp = gfc_check_dependency (lhs_expr, rhs_expr, false) == 0
+  may_require_tmp = gfc_check_dependency (lhs_expr, rhs_expr, true) == 0
 		    ? boolean_false_node : boolean_true_node;
   gfc_init_block (&block);
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_dependency_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_dependency_1.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dc4cbacba1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_dependency_1.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-options "-fcoarray=lib -lcaf_single" }
+!
+! Check that reffing x on both sides of a coarray send does not ICE. 
+! PR 85507
+
+program check_dependency
+  integer :: x[*]
+  x[42] = x
+end program check_dependency
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90
index a7567af7b8f..171a27bd4c3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_lib_comm_1.f90
@@ -38,9 +38,8 @@ B(1:5) = B(3:7)
 if (any (A-B /= 0)) STOP 4
 end
 
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_get \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 4, 4, 0, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_get \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 4, 4, 1, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_get \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 4, 4, 1, 0B\\\);" 2 "original" } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_get \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, &p, 4, 4, 1, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
 ! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_get \\\(caf_token.1, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) b, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, &p, 4, 4, 0, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
-! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_sendget \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, 4, 4, 0, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
+! { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_gfortran_caf_sendget \\\(caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, caf_token.0, \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) parm.\[0-9\]+.data - \\\(integer\\\(kind=\[48\]\\\)\\\) a, 1, &parm.\[0-9\]+, 0B, 4, 4, 1, 0B\\\);" 1 "original" } }
 

Reply via email to