> From: DJ Delorie <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:47:49 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: > > > DJ, would the following semi-kludgey workaround be acceptable? > > It would be no worse than what we have now, if the only purpose is to > avoid a warning. > > Ideally, we would check to see if we're discarding non-zero values from > that offset, and not call the callback with known bogus data. I suppose > the usefulness of that depends on how often you'll encounter 4Gb+ xcoff64 > files on mingw32 ?
The answer to that question is "never", AFAIU.
