Hi!

There is no get_base_ref_and_offset function and AFAIK never has been,
my guess is these comments meant get_ref_base_and_extent.
Ok for trunk?

2017-12-08  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * ipa-polymorphic-call.c (noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store): Fix
        a comment typo, get_base_ref_and_offset -> get_ref_base_and_extent.
        * ipa-prop.c (stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store): Likewise.

--- gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c.jj       2017-10-10 22:04:02.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/ipa-polymorphic-call.c  2017-12-08 15:49:00.883187008 +0100
@@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ noncall_stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store (gimp
          if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == COMPONENT_REF
              && !DECL_VIRTUAL_P (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1)))
            return false;
-         /* In the future we might want to use get_base_ref_and_offset to find
+         /* In the future we might want to use get_ref_base_and_extent to find
             if there is a field corresponding to the offset and if so, proceed
             almost like if it was a component ref.  */
        }
--- gcc/ipa-prop.c.jj   2017-11-28 22:19:30.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/ipa-prop.c      2017-12-08 15:48:43.848397515 +0100
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ stmt_may_be_vtbl_ptr_store (gimple *stmt
          if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == COMPONENT_REF
              && !DECL_VIRTUAL_P (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 1)))
            return false;
-         /* In the future we might want to use get_base_ref_and_offset to find
+         /* In the future we might want to use get_ref_base_and_extent to find
             if there is a field corresponding to the offset and if so, proceed
             almost like if it was a component ref.  */
        }

        Jakub

Reply via email to