On 12/01/2017 03:28 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > On 16/11/2017 16:33, Koval, Julia wrote: >> // I failed to send patch itself, it is too big even in gzipped form. >> What is the right way to send such big patches? >> >> Hi, this patch removes cilkplus. Ok for trunk? > Now that cilkplus is gone I suppose we should clean-up Bugzilla about > that. Shall I go ahead and essentially close all the bugs we got? As > WONTFIX or what else? Let's agree on something. In principle we could > keep the regressions for the sake of the existing release branches but I > think we got very, very, few of those and anyway I don't see who gonna > work on that... Not sure if we have a policy in this space or not.
If we don't then my vote would be for CLOSE/WONTFIX now. That seems to most accurately reflect state -- we're not going to be fixing any Cilk+ stuff on the trunk or in the release branches. jeff
