On Oct 20, 2017, at 4:47 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:41:04PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> As this was rediscovered with PR81294, I've gone ahead with the backport for >> 6. >> It does not apply to 5, as the faulty code doesn't exist there. > > Well, 5 is closed anyway. > Right, of course -- I was still looking to see if there would be an easy patch for Doko to carry if he so chose, but that's not looking good.
Bill
