Hi,

Can I backport my patch r249639 (Add -mfloat-abi=hard to arm_neon_ok)
to the gcc-7 branch ?
It fixes a few false failures.

It applies cleanly to current trunk, and we have had it in our
linaro-7-branch for a while.

Thanks.

Christophe
        gcc/
        Backport from trunk r249639.
        2017-06-26  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>

        * doc/sourcebuild.texi (ARM-specific attributes): Document new
        arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi effective target.

        gcc/testsuite/
        Backport from trunk r249639.
        2017-06-26  Christophe Lyon  <christophe.l...@linaro.org>

        * lib/target-supports.exp
        (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache): Add flags with
        -mfloat-abi=hard. Include arm_neon.h.
        (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache): New.
        (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi): New.
        * gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c: Require
        arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Add -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options.
        * gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c: Require
        arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Remove dg-suppress-ld-options.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index 84d9a22..c7bb4b7 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
@@ -1570,6 +1570,12 @@
 ARM Target supports @code{-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp} or compatible
 options.  Some multilibs may be incompatible with these options.
 
+@item arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi
+@anchor{arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi}
+ARM Target supports NEON with @code{-mfpu=neon}, but without any
+-mfloat-abi= option.  Some multilibs may be incompatible with this
+option.
+
 @item arm_neonv2_ok
 @anchor{arm_neonv2_ok}
 ARM Target supports @code{-mfpu=neon-vfpv4 -mfloat-abi=softfp} or compatible
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
index ebc5f44..f00480b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-lto-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */
-/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto}} } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */
+/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */
 
 #include "arm_neon.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
index 6b2def9..5d7cea7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* { dg-lto-do run } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */
 /* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */
-/* { dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} } */
 
 #include "arm_neon.h"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp 
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 57caec7..d20e7d3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -3428,8 +3428,9 @@
     global et_arm_neon_flags
     set et_arm_neon_flags ""
     if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
-       foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon 
-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a"} {
+       foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon 
-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a" 
"-mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard 
-march=armv7-a"} {
            if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok object {
+               #include <arm_neon.h>
                int dummy;
                #ifndef __ARM_NEON__
                #error not NEON
@@ -3454,6 +3455,38 @@
                check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache]
 }
 
+# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=neon without any
+# -mfloat-abi= option.  Useful in tests where add_options is not
+# supported (such as lto tests).
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache { } {
+    if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
+       foreach flags {"-mfpu=neon"} {
+           if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi 
object {
+               #include <arm_neon.h>
+               int dummy;
+               #ifndef __ARM_NEON__
+               #error not NEON
+               #endif
+               /* Avoid the case where a test adds -mfpu=neon, but the 
toolchain is
+                  configured for -mcpu=arm926ej-s, for example.  */
+               #if __ARM_ARCH < 7 || __ARM_ARCH_PROFILE == 'M'
+               #error Architecture does not support NEON.
+               #endif
+           } "$flags"] } {
+               return 1
+           }
+       }
+    }
+
+    return 0
+}
+
+proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi { } {
+    return [check_cached_effective_target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi \
+               check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache]
+}
+
 proc check_effective_target_arm_crc_ok_nocache { } {
     global et_arm_crc_flags
     set et_arm_crc_flags "-march=armv8-a+crc"

Reply via email to