On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Douglas Rupp <r...@gnat.com> wrote: > On 10/3/2011 8:35 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> >> "unnamed variadic functions" sounds as if the function itself is >> unnamed, so not good. >> >> >> -funnamed-variadic-parameter > > How about > -fvariadic-parameters-unnamed > > there's already a -fvariadic-macros, so maybe putting variadic first is more > consistent?
consistent with what? Consistency would imply -fvariadic-functions. But that does not make much sense since variadic functions already exist in C. -fvariadic-parameters-unnamed sounds as if the function could have several variadic parameters, but that is what is being proposed.
