On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 8:48 PM, Andrew Pinski <apin...@cavium.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> When I was playing around where lowering of bit-field accesses go in
> the pass order, I found that DOM had the same issue as PRE had when it
> came to comparing BIT_INSERT_EXPR for equality. The same exact
> testcase was showing the wrong code; gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040324-1.c.
>
> This fixes DOM the same way as I had fixed PRE, by special casing
> BIT_INSERT_EXPR due to the implicit operand.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Watch excess vertical space:
+ return false;
+
+
if (operand_equal_p (expr0->ops.ternary.opnd0,
Ok with that fixed.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> ChangeLog:
> * tree-ssa-scopedtables.c (hashable_expr_equal_p): Check
> BIT_INSERT_EXPR's operand 1
> to see if the types precision matches.
