On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:02:34PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Just to be clear: I don't mean to suggest to do this in this patch
> or necessarily even for this warning. I'm not even sure to what
> extent it might be doable. I mention it mostly as food for thought.
Sure, and it makes sense (where it's possible). But this particular
patch just adds the types to the diagnostic and I think anything more
is beyond the scope of this patch. So - still presenting it as it was :).
Thanks for looking into this,
Marek
