Re: [v3] define string::pop_back()

Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:08:10 -0700 

On 10/04/2011 11:35 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

Tested x86_64-linux, any objections to committing?
No objections, but I think the basic_string exports have to be adjusted, to export the new member functions at the current minor version. 

Paolo.






















					Reply via email to