On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: > On 06/30/2017 03:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: >>> >>> We used to give conversion operatos type-specific mangled names. Now we >>> just number them 'operator $N' for N in [1,...]. As such >>> mangle_convop_name_for_type is misnamed and has no place in mangle.c >> >> Hmm, wouldn't actual mangling make more sense, so that it's consistent >> between compilations? > > While that would work, I have a different and simpler plan in mind.
Suspense! :) Jason
