On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
> We used to give conversion operatos type-specific mangled names.  Now we
> just number them 'operator $N' for N in [1,...].  As such
> mangle_convop_name_for_type is misnamed and has no place in mangle.c

Hmm, wouldn't actual mangling make more sense, so that it's consistent
between compilations?

Jason

Reply via email to