On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote: > We used to give conversion operatos type-specific mangled names. Now we > just number them 'operator $N' for N in [1,...]. As such > mangle_convop_name_for_type is misnamed and has no place in mangle.c
Hmm, wouldn't actual mangling make more sense, so that it's consistent between compilations? Jason