On Mai 10 2017, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: > ... on a 32-bit system, of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2017-05/msg01063.html FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/generic_20.f90 -Os execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_5.f90 -O0 output pattern test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O0 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -O3 -g execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/matmul_bounds_6.f90 -Os execution test Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
