OK.

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Bernd Edlinger
<bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote:
> On 04/05/17 00:33, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>> On 5 April 2017 at 00:29, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote:
>>>> The new test doesn't really belong in the libstdc++, does it?
>>>>
>>>> If this is a bug in the front-end then a reduced version of the test
>>>> belongs in the g++ testsuite.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I moved the test case to the g++.dg/lto branch, where it
>>> fortunately also works (I forgot to mention that the crash only
>>> happened with -flto).
>>>
>>> Is it Ok for trunk?
>>
>>
>> That's not a reduced test. You need to remove dependencies to library
>> facilities.
>>
>
> I replaced the dependency to VERIFY and used a own macro,
> and verified, that the test still produce the error.
>
> It is IMHO not worth to invest more time than this in a test
> for an already obvious bug-fix.
>
>
> Bernd.

Reply via email to