OK.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote: > On 04/05/17 00:33, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> On 5 April 2017 at 00:29, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote: >>>> The new test doesn't really belong in the libstdc++, does it? >>>> >>>> If this is a bug in the front-end then a reduced version of the test >>>> belongs in the g++ testsuite. >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I moved the test case to the g++.dg/lto branch, where it >>> fortunately also works (I forgot to mention that the crash only >>> happened with -flto). >>> >>> Is it Ok for trunk? >> >> >> That's not a reduced test. You need to remove dependencies to library >> facilities. >> > > I replaced the dependency to VERIFY and used a own macro, > and verified, that the test still produce the error. > > It is IMHO not worth to invest more time than this in a test > for an already obvious bug-fix. > > > Bernd.