On 04/05/17 00:33, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 5 April 2017 at 00:29, Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de> wrote: >>> The new test doesn't really belong in the libstdc++, does it? >>> >>> If this is a bug in the front-end then a reduced version of the test >>> belongs in the g++ testsuite. >>> >> >> Yes, I moved the test case to the g++.dg/lto branch, where it >> fortunately also works (I forgot to mention that the crash only >> happened with -flto). >> >> Is it Ok for trunk? > > > That's not a reduced test. You need to remove dependencies to library > facilities. >
I replaced the dependency to VERIFY and used a own macro, and verified, that the test still produce the error. It is IMHO not worth to invest more time than this in a test for an already obvious bug-fix. Bernd.
