On 12/03/17 11:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Also, I'm offering help around one particular aspect I noticed:
References to dependencies on really, really old versions of
binutils (talking 10+ years here) which I think we can remove.
Let me follow-up with some of you with concrete suggestions
around that.
The arm-*-eabi section currently has this:
ARM-family processors. Subtargets that use the ELF object format
require GNU binutils 2.13 or newer. Such subtargets include:
@code{arm-*-netbsdelf}, @code{arm-*-*linux-*}
and @code{arm-*-rtemseabi}.
Okay to yank this?
Fine by me. Nick is much more involved in binutils development and so might have
a better view of how much older binutils are used in the wild though.
Nick, do you have any objections to this?
Thanks,
Kyrill
Gerald
