On 01/09/16 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 01/09/16 10:03, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> On 01/09/16 08:47, Eric Botcazou wrote: >>>> Since you're going to need a back-port there should be a PR filed for this. >>> >>> PR target/77439 >>> >>>> Have you checked that this works with multi-lib dejagnu runs and on >>>> hard-float systems? I doubt this will work in armhf-linux, for example. >>> >>> No, I guess some dg-skip-if would be in order, but I'm not able to devise >>> one. >>> >> >> Since the test is an execution test, why not just drop the problematic >> parts of dg-options "-mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=softfp" and rely on multilib >> permutations as appropriate. That gives more all-round coverage as well. >> >> R. >> > > That would also allow you to drop the effective-target test as well. > > R. >
This seems to have fallen through a crack. Did you get a chance to try either of these suggestions? R.
