On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 05:58:01PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Michael Eager wrote: > > > On multiple occasions, I have asked Xilinx to submit patches such > > as this one directly to the GCC/Binutils projects (assuming that > > they have a current FSF Copyright Assignment), or to give me > > explicit permission to do so on their behalf, as was the case when > > I originally submitted the MicroBlaze port to these projects. For > > whatever reason, neither has occurred. > > copyright.list shows assignments from Xilinx for GCC, binutils, GDB and > glibc, with no indication that they are not current, or of any restriction > on who at Xilinx can contribute changes. > > Thus, I presume we simply need someone at Xilinx to approve the > contribution of this patch to GCC. The last patch sent to gcc-patches by > someone @xilinx.com appears to have been > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02291.html>; author and > other @xilinx.com people from that discussion CC:ed on this message.
Hi Joseph, There's no problem from our side. In fact, a version of this patch has already been posted to gcc-patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00657.html I don't do any work on the toolchain anymore and don't have the setup to run the testsuite. Ajit or Nagaraju are might be able to help resolve any issues. Cheers, Edgar > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com
