On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 01:21:40PM -0600, Bill Seurer wrote: > (backport from trunk to gcc 6) > > This patch adds the -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option to compilations when > the -fsanitize=address option is seen but not if any > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables options were already specified. > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables causes a full strack trace to be produced when > the sanitizer detects an error. Without the full trace several of the asan > test cases fail on powerpc. > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 for more information. > > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, > powerpc64be-unknown-linux-gnu, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. > Is this ok for trunk?
It already is on trunk... You mean the branches :-) It is okay for all open release branches (i.e., 5 and 6). Or does it not apply to GCC 5? Thanks, Segher > 2017-01-05 Bill Seurer <seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > PR sanitizer/65479 > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal): Add > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables option when -fsanitize=address is > specified.
