On 5 December 2016 at 21:01, Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > It took me an excessively long time to realise that processing the > typespec for an explicitly typed module procedure was wiping out the > interface symbol and so preventing the comparison of characteristics > between the interface and the separate module procedure. Transferring > the module interface symbol to the tlink field, rather than the > interface, fixed the problem without doing anything else. > > Note the comment in the gfortran.h about the use of the tlink field. > It has been a while since this was used for change management. If it > is preferred, I could introduce a union between tlink and some other > suitable name; eg mod_proc_interface. > > Bootstraps and regtests on FC21/x86_64. > > OK for trunk and, after a decent interval, 6-branch? > > Paul > > 2016-12-06 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/77903 > * decl.c (get_proc_name): Use the symbol tlink field instead of > the typespec interface field. > (gfc_match_function_decl, gfc_match_submod_proc): Ditto. > * gfortran.h : Since the symbol tlink field is no longer used > by the frontend for change management, change the comment to > reflect its current uses. > * parse.c (get_modproc_result): Same as decl.c changes. > * resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): Ditto. > > 2016-12-06 Paul Thomas <pa...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/77903 > * gfortran.dg/submodule_20.f08: New test.
-- If you're walking down the right path and you're willing to keep walking, eventually you'll make progress. Barack Obama
