On 09/15/2011 05:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/15/2011 02:03 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:47 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 09/09/2011 01:29 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
! { return __sync_mem_add__fetch(&_M_i, 1, memory_order_seq_cst); }
^^ typo
Which begs the question of how this didn't get caught
in the testsuite somewhere?
good catch :-)
a template calling that particular method was probably not invoked. The joys of
c++ templates eh :-)
Isn't there an extension that forces an entire class template to be
instantiated?
It is instantiated, but if someone doesn't actually make a call to
operator++() volatile (which I think is where this mistyped call was),
you don't end up with an unresolved function call...
At least it didn't trip up any tests cases and I did a full bootstrap &
make check.
Andrew
