On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote: > I'm a little concerned the expected output tests may be fragile over > time but let's wait and see.
Indeed, but I'd rather see false negatives than false positives or no coverage at all. And I hope the pieces of expected assembly quoted will help telling any false negatives and actual regressions apart very easily. > OK to commit. Applied now, thanks for your review. Maciej
