On 4 November 2016 at 14:48, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 October 2016 at 21:40, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: >> Hi Jerry, >> >>> See patch below which is very simple. We were handling the case where we >>> tabbed left of current position in the record by clearing the seen_eor >>> flag. We were not handling the case where we tab toward the right and so >>> are still at eor. >>> >>> New test case attached. Regression tested on x86-64-linux. >>> >>> OK to commit? >>> >>> This is a regression relative to g77. Its simple enough I think it >>> should go to 5 and 6 as well. >> >> >> I think so too. OK for all affected branches. >> >> Thanks for the patch! >> > > Hi, > > The new test fails at execution on arm and aarch64: > > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -O0 execution test > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -O1 execution test > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -O2 execution test > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops > -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -O3 -g execution test > gfortran.dg/fmt_t_9.f -Os execution test > > seen on gcc-5 and gcc-6 branches. Maybe I missed it on trunk due to > larger granularity in validations. >
I see it failing on trunk too. > Christophe > > > >> Thomas >>
