> This converts the preprocessor check for WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS into a
> runtime one in rtlanal.c.
> 
> Since this one was in combination with an "#if defined" and used to guard an
> if-statement I'd appreciate it if someone gave it a double-check that I
> dind't screw up the intended behaviour.

Unfortunately I think you did, as the old version was:

#if WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS && defined (LOAD_EXTEND_OP)
          /* If this is a typical RISC machine, we only have to worry
             about the way loads are extended.  */
          if ((LOAD_EXTEND_OP (inner_mode) == SIGN_EXTEND
               ? val_signbit_known_set_p (inner_mode, nonzero)
               : LOAD_EXTEND_OP (inner_mode) != ZERO_EXTEND)
              || !MEM_P (SUBREG_REG (x)))
#endif

and the new version is:

#ifdef LOAD_EXTEND_OP
          /* If this is a typical RISC machine, we only have to worry
             about the way loads are extended.  */
          if (WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS
              && ((LOAD_EXTEND_OP (inner_mode) == SIGN_EXTEND
                     ? val_signbit_known_set_p (inner_mode, nonzero)
                     : LOAD_EXTEND_OP (inner_mode) != ZERO_EXTEND)
                   || !MEM_P (SUBREG_REG (x))))
#endif

So if WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS is zero and LOAD_EXTEND_OP is defined, for 
example on PowerPC, the block guarded by the condition is always executed in 
the former case but never in the latter case.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to